Mental Injury: New Occupational Hazard?

March 17, 2011
I was rushing through my morning paper before work when this headline grabbed me: “Mental Health Can Suffer When Jobless Get a Bad Job.” According to a study published in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, the psychosocial quality of ...

I was rushing through my morning paper before work when this headline grabbed me: “Mental Health Can Suffer When Jobless Get a Bad Job.” According to a study published in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, the psychosocial quality of work determines whether employment has benefits for mental health. My take-away from this article was, if you're unemployed, you might have a better chance of keeping all your marbles than someone working and miserable.

Just to be clear, the report does say that moving from unemployment into a high quality job led to improved mental health. However the transition from unemployment to a poor quality job was more detrimental to mental health than remaining unemployed. The report's conclusion: “Work of poor psychosocial quality does not bestow the same mental health benefits as employment in jobs with high psychosocial quality.”

We write a lot about the physical dangers of operating poorly maintained lift trucks, working around poorly trained lift truck operators, handling broken pallets, falling off docks, picking up heavy products, etc., etc. I've even heard about the rise of on-the-job bullying and even physical violence. But this study may add another occupational hazard: psychological damage.

After reading about this study, I took another look at the comments MH&L received from respondents to its annual salary survey. I must say, I'm now a little worried about some of your colleagues. Here's what some respondents told us:

“I am so disappointed in the new conveyors, vertical lifts, palletizers and wrappers that we installed this year.”

“I am working towards becoming a professional stock options investor, so I'm not the most enthusiastic about my current career.”

“I would be happier if the people who are in the know would understand what their greed has done to individual lives.”

“Increased responsibilities and duties have stretched manpower thin, making it harder to do the job correctly.”

“Low wages – man's world.”

And finally, the following response to our question “What is the biggest challenge facing the material handling and logistics industry today?”:

“Trying to make a very basic down and dirty industry too complicated.”

I don't know whether that last person was referring to the material handling industry in general or to our magazine in particular, but I think my feelings are hurt. Where's OSHA when you need them?

About the Author

Tom Andel Blog | former Editor-in-Chief

As editor-in-chief from 2010-2014, Tom Andel oversaw the strategic development of MH&L and MHLnews.com, bringing 30+ years of thought leadership and award winning coverage of supply chain, manufacturing logistics and material handling. Throughout his career he also served in various editorial capacities at other industry titles, including Transportation & Distribution, Material Handling Engineering, Material Handling Management (predecessors to MH&L), as well as Logistics Management and Modern Materials Handling. Andel is a three-time finalist in the Jesse H. Neal Business Journalism Awards, the most respected editorial award in B2B trade publishing, and a graduate of Cleveland’s Case Western Reserve University.

Latest from Chain of Thought

#53124956@Michal Bednarek\Dreamstime
What is Your Workforce Thinking?
#228912201@Nicoelnino|Drea,sto,e
Key Elements of Sustainable Procurement Strategy
Photo by David Adams U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District