Solution Selector: Sea ports and ocean carriers
U.S. seaports continue to organize, train for and fund compliance with security regulations resulting from various homeland security initiatives launched after the terrorist attacks of 9/11. While these efforts haven't had much of a tangible effect on shippers, increasing trade volumes certainly have.
Congestion at ports has increased dramatically in the past year; though some port authorities have started to deal with the problems, the issues are long-term and will require infrastructure upgrades and expansion. Landside efficiency has been affected by idling rules in some ports designed to reduce air pollution, container and chassis shortages and container charges, among other factors.
The rise of offshore sourcing in Asia (specifically China) has made the situation more acute at West Coast ports, but other ports are not free from problems. Longer term, initiatives like the African Growth and Opportunity Act and the expansion of the European Union may add volume to East Coast trade, taxing those ports. (Some Chinese manufacturers are already outsourcing to western Africa.)
Importers and exporters will have to stay on top of developments at key ports as capacity can quickly get out of synch with demand. For many ports the solution to five-year growth projections may come in the form of a seven-year infrastructure project.
Bigger is better in ocean freight, at least from the perspective of ship operators. Shipbuilders' order books are strong for large container ships and the once awe-inspiring 8,000 TEU ship is now almost commonplace.
Ocean carriers gain efficiency on the seas from these large ships, but could face some problems at ports, especially as larger ships are discussed, designed and built.
With many of the ships in the Asian trades running with a substantial cargo of empty containers, using fewer ships to move large volumes of containers can help control costs. To keep containers in the pipeline, ocean carriers have added tough rules and some stiff detention fees for containers that leave the port area. U.S. importers are faced with a decision on whether to "break" the container at the port or pay to move it to and from their inland distribution center.
Third parties — some of them divisions of ocean carriers — are seeing a growing business in "deconsolidation centers" where import shipments are received, unloaded from 40-foot containers, crossdocked and reconsolidated into 53-foot trailers at a 3-to-2 ratio and moved to the destination distribution center.
With offshore manufacturing and sourcing continuing at a strong pace, the situation isn't likely to change much in the near future.
To help determine which ports and which carriers are best suited for your specific shipping needs, Logistics Today offers the exclusive Solution Selector, which matches up the ports and the ocean carriers and their respective capabilities.
All of the information in the accompanying charts, as well as in Solution Selector, was provided by the port authorities and the carriers.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cleveland Cuyahoga County Port Authority, Maritime |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
13,000,000
|
steel, limestone, cement |
steel, machinery |
||
| Georgia Ports Authority |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
15,310,037
|
anhydrous ammonia, autombiles, iron &
steel
|
wood pulp, soybeans, machinery
|
| Illinois Int'l Port District, Port of Chicago |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
24,000,000
|
steel
|
steel
|
| Kansas City Smart Port |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||
| Lake Charles & Terminal Dist. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
10,419,225
|
break bulk, petroleum
|
rice
|
|||
| Massachusetts Port Authority, Maritime Dept. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
footwear, beer & wine
|
hides, wastepaper
|
|||||
| Mississippi State Port Auth. at Gulfport, Trade Development |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
2,300,000
|
fruit, general cargo, bulk |
paper, frozen, general
|
|
| Oregon Int'l. Port of Coos Bay |
•
|
•
|
1,900,000
|
logs
|
wood chips, manufactured forest products,
logs
|
||||||
| Panama City Port Authority |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
880,000
|
copper, steel, aggregate, molasses
|
paper, wood pulp, pipe (steel)
|
||
| Port of Pensacola |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
504,000
|
paper, limestone
|
bagged goods, energy equipment
|
||
| Philadelphia Reg'l Port Authority |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
4,000,000
|
fruit, meat, cocoa beans, steel, paper
|
project/heavy lift cargoes
|
| Plaquemines Port |
•
|
•
|
53,579,090
|
coal, fuel oil
|
fuel oil, coal
|
||||||
| Port Arthur Navigation |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
850,000
|
metal, forest products
|
forest products
|
|
| Port Authority of Guam |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
2,067,000
|
general cargo, liquid bulk, automobiles,
construction
|
garments, household
|
||||
| Port Canaveral |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
||||||
| Port Freeport |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
25,000,000
|
bananas, foods |
chemicals
|
| Port of Anchorage |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
4,400,000
|
general cargo
|
petroleum
|
||||
| Port of Baton Rouge |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||
| Port of Brownsville |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
3,650,690
|
iron, steel
|
iron, steel
|
| Port of Houston Authority |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
30,030,305
|
||
| Port of Hueneme |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
1,000,000
|
fresh produce, automobiles
|
fresh produce
|
|||
| Port of Longview |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
1,600,000
|
steel |
bulks, forest
|
|||
| Port of Los Angeles |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
147,500,000
|
furniture, apparel, electronics
|
sastepaper, synthetic resins, fabric (including
raw cotton)
|
||
| Port of Milwaukee |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
3,000,000
|
salt, coal, cement |
grain, machinery
|
|
| Port of New Orleans |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
30,000,000
|
steel, non-ferrous metals, coffee, rubber, forest
products
|
steel, poultry, forest products
|
|
| Port of Olympia |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
aluminum, steel, break bulk
|
roll on/roll off container forest
|
|
| Port of Ponce |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||
| Port of Portland (OR) |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
11,957,917
|
automobiles, container, steel
|
grain, mineral bulks, agricultural products
|
| Port of Redwood City |
•
|
•
|
1,500,000
|
cement, sand, gypsum, bauxite
|
scrap metal
|
||||||
| Port of Richmond (CA) |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
18,284,567
|
automobiles, break bulk
|
liquid
|
||||
| Port of Richmond Terminal (VA) |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
43,249
|
tobacco, chemicals, steel, forest products
|
tobacco products, chemicals, project cargo
|
||||
| Port of Sacramento |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
800,000
|
fertilizer, lumber, steel, cement
|
rice, wheat, mineral ores, project cargo
|
||
| Port of San Francisco, Maritime |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
2,103,299
|
lumber, steel
|
||||
| Port of Shreveport/Bossier |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
448,324
|
fertilizer, coal, petroleum
|
|
| Port of South Louisiana |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
250,000,000
|
break bulk, grain, petroleum, specialized
chemicals
|
break bulk, grain, petroleum, specialized
chemicals
|
|
| Port of Stockton |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
1,856,000
|
cement, fertilizer products
|
sulfur, wheat, bagged rice
|
| Port of Wilmington (DE) |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
4,800,000
|
petroleum, fruit, juice, meat, automobiles,
paper, steel, lumber
|
paper, automobiles, bulk
|
| St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal Dist. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
2,500,000
|
fertilizer, ferro alloys, aggregates, steel
|
coke, steel
|
||
| Tampa Port Authority |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
48,500,000
|
petroleum, coal, liquid sulfur
|
fertilizer, phosphate rock, citrus pellets
|
| Toledo-Lucas Cty. Port Authority |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
11,000,000
|
iron ore
|
coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ABF Freight System Inc. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| Air Waves Intl. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
| Alaska Marine Lines Inc. (Lynden) |
•
|
||||||||
| ALG Worldwide Logistics |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| APL Ltd. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
||||
| Atlantic Container Line |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
||
| Australia/New Zealand Direct Line, CP Ships |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| Averitt Express |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| BAX Global Inc. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
| Commodity Logistics |
•
|
•
|
|||||||
| Crowley Maritime Corp. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
||||
| DHL |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| Exel Transportation Svcs. Inc. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| FedEx Express |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| FedEx Trade Networks |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| FMI International |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
||
| Hellmann Worldwide Logistics Inc. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| Hyundai Merchant Marine |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||
| ICAT Logistics |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
||
| Koch Logistics |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
| Lithogistics Inc. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
||
| Lynden |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||
| Maersk Logistics |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
||
| Megatrux Inc. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| Overseas Orient Container Line |
•
|
||||||||
| Ozburn-Hessey Logistics |
•
|
•
|
|||||||
| P&O Nedlloyd Logistics |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
| Pilot Air Freight |
•
|
•
|
|||||||
| Railinc |
•
|
||||||||
| Roadway Express Inc. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||
| Ruan Transportation Svcs. |
•
|
•
|
|||||||
| Schneider Logistics |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| The Delco Group Ltd. |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|
| UPS Supply Chain Solutions |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
||
| USXpress |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
| Viking Logistics |
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.
Advertisement
Feature Article
2012 Top 10 Predictions for the Supply Chain in 2012
2012 will see the consumer take a more prominent role in directing the course of supply chain management, as volatile demand has become the new norm.
More Feature Articles
- How Lift Truck Fleet Management Helped a 3PL Improve Service
- Commentary: Why Logistics and Politics Need to Mix — for the Economy’s Sake
- It Only Takes a Moment to Win - or Lose - a Customer
More Web Exclusive Features
More from the January Issue
MH&L Video Spotlight
Kuna Foodservice, a food distributor based in St. Louis, Mo., expanded to a 98,000 sq. ft. distribution center that includes a refrigerated receiving dock, freezer and storage area for paper and canned goods. Learn more.
Featured Suppliers
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement











Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus