Combustible Dust: What You Need to Know
Prepare for OSHA’s new combustible dust standard by learning about dust explosions and how to prevent them.
If the flame and pressure wave move faster than the speed of sound, the explosion is classified as a detonation.2 Detonations generally are associated with high explosives and, in general, cannot be controlled with pressurerelief vents of any type.
This same mechanism will occur with any material that can oxidize with the release of heat (called an exothermic reaction). Therefore, most organic chemicals, plastics, foods, metals, carbon compounds, pharmaceuticals and chemical intermediates can present a risk when they are in the form of very fine powders. The finer the powder, the greater the risk. In contrast, materials that require the addition of heat to oxidize (endothermic reactions) will not spontaneously ignite or explode.
Dust Hazard Reduction
Once we understand how and why
dusts can become fire and explosion
risks, we can determine how best to
bring industrial facilities into compliance
with OSHA’s NEP and the eventual
combustible dust standard. While
it may not be possible to eliminate all
dust, the primary goal must be the
prevention of major, or catastrophic,
explosions inside the facility.
To accomplish this, the first task is to reduce or eliminate accumulations of combustible dusts from exposed and hidden surfaces inside the plant. Most catastrophic explosions—those that create the greatest devastation and loss of life within a facility—are secondary explosions caused when the shock or pressure wave from a smaller, primary explosion causes accumulated dust on horizontal surfaces to become airborne, where it is ignited by the primary ignition source. As this accumulated dust can extend for great distances away from the initial ignition source, the small fire or explosion can expand rapidly and cause millions of dollars in damage and even severe injury or death.
The NFPA has determined that dust accumulations of as little as 1/32nd of an inch (approximately the same thickness as an average paper clip) are sufficient to create a dust deflagration when dispersed and exposed to an ignition source.3 The removal of accumulated hazardous materials is the primary emphasis of OSHA’s NEP plan and the focus of OSHA inspections.4
There are three essential components to the reduction of hazardous dust accumulations. These include: identification of problem areas, identification of problem dusts and elimination of dust hazards.
Within all industrial facilities where powdered materials are handled or generated, some dust escapes from processing and conveying equipment. This dust naturally settles on horizontal surfaces in close proximity to the dust source. These surfaces may be on top of equipment or on stairs, railings, support steel, light fixtures, etc.
Over time, the accumulation of dust may become extensive. Highly visible surfaces are often cleaned on a periodic basis and may present a minimal hazard. However, hidden surfaces— such as support steel, roof support members and trusses, equipment surfaces above eye level, light fixtures and elevated ductwork, piping or cable trays—are generally overlooked.
These problem areas will draw the attention of OSHA inspectors and are the areas that facility managers should concentrate on cleaning.4
The watchword for reducing the risk of dust explosions is “housekeeping”—cleaning up dust accumulation in all areas, visible and hidden. The second aspect of reducing dust explosion risk is identifying the hazardous nature of accumulated dusts. Not all dusts present fire or explosion risks. While it is preferred that all accumulated dusts be cleaned up for safety reasons, the emphasis here is to concentrate on those dusts that present a real fire or explosion risk.
Conduct an inventory of all the powdered materials within the facility and review material safety data sheets (MSDS) to determine if a risk already has been identified. In the event the MSDS is incomplete, or if no MSDS exists for the powder under review, physical hazard testing may need to be conducted. Several NFPA publications2,5,6,7 provide additional information on explosive and combustible materials. Of course, a hazard may be assumed to exist for all unidentified materials and a cleanup undertaken anyway.
Eliminating problems involves the general housekeeping chores discussed above but goes beyond to address the sources of the primary dust and ignition sources. This involves a review of the process and process equipment to minimize any openings where dust can escape and eliminate sources of heat, sparks, combustion, etc., wherever possible. To facilitate this process, OSHA and the CSB rely on the NFPA and its collection of codes, standards and guidelines, which will be discussed in Part 2 of this article.
Michael A. Maxwell is vice president of engineering and technology and manager of applications for Griffin Filters. He earned a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from Iowa State University and a master’s degree in business administration from Lewis University. He has more than 36 years of experience in dust collection design, application and installation and has been a member of the NFPA since 1994. This article originally appeared in MHM’s sister publication, EHS Today
References
1. U.S Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation
Board, July 29, 2008.
2. NFPA 68-2007, Standard on Explosion Protection
by Deflagration Venting, National Fire Protection
Association, 2006.
3. NFPA 654-2006, Prevention of Fire and Dust
Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing and
Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids, National
Fire Protection Association, 2006.
4. CPL 03-00-008 Combustible Dust National
Emphasis Program, 03/11/2008, U.S. Department of
Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
Washington, D.C.
5. NFPA 484-2009, Combustible Metals, National
Fire Protection Association, 2009.
6. NFPA 495-2006, Explosive Materials Code,
National Fire Protection Association, 2006.
7. NFPA 499-2008, Classification of Combustible
Dusts and of Hazardous (Classified) Locations for
Electrical Installations in Chemical Process Areas,
National Fire Protection Association, 2008.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.
Advertisement
Feature Article
2012 Top 10 Predictions for the Supply Chain in 2012
2012 will see the consumer take a more prominent role in directing the course of supply chain management, as volatile demand has become the new norm.
More Feature Articles
- How Lift Truck Fleet Management Helped a 3PL Improve Service
- Commentary: Why Logistics and Politics Need to Mix — for the Economy’s Sake
- It Only Takes a Moment to Win - or Lose - a Customer
More Web Exclusive Features
More from the January Issue
MH&L Video Spotlight
Kuna Foodservice, a food distributor based in St. Louis, Mo., expanded to a 98,000 sq. ft. distribution center that includes a refrigerated receiving dock, freezer and storage area for paper and canned goods. Learn more.
Featured Suppliers
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement








Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus